Hillary Clinton erases her servers forever eradicating evidences that may have been damaging to her political aspirations.  The GOP seems surprised.

This is the same woman whose political career BEGAN with her being fired from a commission examing the legalities and illegalities of Richard Nixon.  Read on:

Excerpted from EO-History: The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

The pundits are surprised.  Idiots.  If ever there was a politician who espouses the Soviet ideology of doing whatever is in their own best interest, it is Hillary Clinton.

“Oh, let’s go after Cheryl Mills.” they say.  “Let’s subpeona Huma.” they say.  You think they will talk?  You think they want to end up dead?  Look at the history of people who’ve stood up to them.  There are a LOT of tombstones in that line.

Here comes your 45th President, America.  Likely to be our last.
Read more at http://patdollard.com/2013/05/flashback-hillary-clinton-fired-from-watergate-investigation-for-lying-unethical-behavior-conspiracy-to-violate-the-constitution/#8RYwmBvLwPwOykl1.99

So, Indiana passes legislation that allows people of strong faith to not serve people whose lifestyle violate or tarnish said faith.  For example, if you are gay and want to get married, cake makers are allowed to say no if they are pro-traditional marriage.

Washington, one of the most liberal states in the nation and bastion of gay rights (they call it diversity) announced a ban on official travel to Indiana.  This means that official travel, paid for by the state–the PEOPLE’S money will not be spent on travel or business with Indiana.

A few select people, UNELECTED for the most part, have initiated a boycott of government level commerce one state to another.

If you ask me, Indiana’s response should be:  “So fucking what?”

So, the Social Security Administration recently released statistics showing that over 6.5 million people in their records OVER 112 years old are still alive. I mean, the life expectancy in America is increasing, but that is too much.

No, the SSA confirmed that their computer system is outdated (we need more money) and they can’t keep up with inputting data when people die. Untold was if, since their system still thinks Grannie is alive, are they still sending checks?

Some of the “un-dead” accounts have been used to fraudulently open bank accounts (money laundering—drug cartels). Thousand were used by illegals trying to get employment. SO how is it that drug dealers and illegal aliens know these numbers? Who is selling them the data?

The article reads that between 2008 and 2011 SSA received 4024 E-Verify inquiries using the SSNs of 3873 number holders born before June 16, 1901. These inquires “indicate” individuals’ attempts to use SSNs to apply for work.

“Indicate”. Well, it’s either that or those 4024 people came to the realization that the amount they are getting for their monthly check is not enough to live on and need to find axillary work to make ends meet. They should be applying for Obamacare so they get subsidies as well.

The government doesn’t know when you die and can’t keep records straight to stop paying you after you do. And they want to be in charge of your health care.

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

B. Hussein, on the hallmark anniversary of the Selma civil rights march, “leads” (meaning he was in the middle of the front row) a crowd across the bridge. Also in attendance, but not seen on White House picture releases, nor the pictures published in the New York Times, were George W. and Laura Bush. Their omission implies that they were not there, not care about the issue of civil rights. The media forgets the undisputed fact that it was REPUBLICAN Congressman who started and supported the civil rights movement. Democrats like Governor George Wallace were against it.

Also of note, no one probably remembers that back in 2007, B. Hussein gave a speech where he stated that the civil rights movement and in particular, the march across the bridge in Selma, Alabama inspired his parents to get together and conceive him.

Never mind that the march was in 1965 and that he began contaminating the Earth in 1961. The civil rights march when he was 4 was why he was even born.

He HAS to inject himself into everything; every historical event, every sporting event, every Hollywood event, everything. It is all about him.

He does this for a few very simple reasons.

1. He is certain that you are stupid. You will not fact check what he says. If you do, you are a right wing nut who deserves no credibility or air time in the media to rebut his lies. If you are liberal, he knows with every fiber of his being that you will accept what he says as gospel and will take up his side to protect his image and legacy.
2. The media will, almost entirely, protect him as well. Only “fringe” outlets spoke about the historical inaccuracy and medical impossibility of his remarks. They said that his remarks were taken out of context.

His remarks in their entirety: “Because of the Selma march, “a young man named Barack Obama” was given the opportunity to come “over to this country,” where “he met this woman whose great-great-great-great-grandfather had owned slaves,” the senator said just weeks before announcing his bid for the presidency, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. “So they got together, and Barack Obama Jr. was born. So don’t tell me I don’t have a claim on Selma, Ala. Don’t tell me I’m not coming home to Selma, Ala.”

Where is the mistake in context? Where do we have it wrong? He clearly states that he is here because of the Selma march in 1965. And the media give him a pass.

3. He doesn’t give a shit what you think. Even if it is given air time and gains some steam, he simply does not care. He is the President. You never will be. He has the power. You never will. Keep making noise and the IRS will audit you. The ATF will come inspect your privately owned, perfectly legal armory. OSHA will visit your business—you know, the one you didn’t build.

Elect Hillary and we’ll have four more years of the same thing, or even worse. She’s not exaggerating history. She’s breaking the law and is getting a pass.

Today on the radio I listened to an unknown pundit saying that “Mark Levin was right. We need term limits.” It got me thinking. Until then I too was firmly on the side of term limits. I’ve blogged before about how some of this “elected elite” get to Washington and then manage to stay there for decades. Some of the ones there now have been slinking down the halls of power for 40 years or better. They get there and then rather than doing the people’s business, they spend their efforts just finding new ways to –stay there.

So, I wondered…would term limits help or hurt? It depends on what you want done. If you want a fresh batch of blood and brains circulating through the seat of power, then term limits help. Of course, you’ll never get term limits passed through Congress. Why would they voluntarily decide to pass a law that kicks them out of their job?

But let’s say the term limits pass? Rather than focusing on the legislative process they will focus on networking and building their future after being forced out of office. It’s human nature—or my definition of it, anyway. I might have a more pessimistic view than do you. But I see the elected diverting to a pure form of “selfish economics”. They will just spend their elected career sowing seeds of favor to the same corporations that now finance campaigns to keep “like minded” politicians in office.

So, what is our alternative? I don’t see a decent option but changing to socialism, communism, or sharia isn’t one of my choices. We even have to deal with the cronyism we already have, or figure out how to fight the next brand of it.