Sarcastic Sentry Volume 4.1, Issue 1

…then there is the bloated whale, Randa Jarrar, the psychotic literature professor from Fresno State.  She is known largely for her voracious appetite, and for insulting the life and achievements of a woman far better than her—Barbara Bush.  She waited about 12 minutes before tweeting this:

“PSA—either you are against these pieces of shit and their genocidal ways or you are part of the problem.  That’s actually how simple this is.  I’m happy the witch is dead.  Can’t wait for the rest of her family to fall to their demise the way 1.5 million Iraqis have.  Byyyeeeee.”

 Where to start?  I’m up for this challenge.

 First—she calls it a public service announcement.  The operative word here is service.  This twit actually is so immersed in her own perception of self importance that she believes everything that spews forth (non-food crumb related, of course), is a service to the masses.  We, the cattle, that is.  That a whopping 32 people liked her remark (as of 8:38pm, 4/17/18) tells you she has a far wider swath of fabric around her mid-rift than influence among thinking people.  That was probably the bulk of her students (pun NOT intended in this case) who get extra credit for following her on Twitter.

 Second—the decisive A or B choice she foists on all who read (are forced to read) her banal remarks.  You MUST either be against the Bush family, philosophically, one imagines, or you MUST be part of the problem.  As she says, it is that simple.  It is either this or that.  How utterly inclusive of her, a tenured professor, published author (so am I, you dripping gash), and critical thinker.  You can just taste the frothing of diversity gravy she is warming up.

 Third—calling Barbara Bush a witch.  Really, this woman ranked in the top 3 of most admired women throughout her time as first lady.  She even got applause for a speech given at a liberal woman’s college when she stated that someone in the audience may even be a future spouse of a President, so she wished HIM well.  That’s forward thinking.

 Fourth—that she wishes the rest of the family dies as 1.5 million Iraqis have.  This point is really two.  Is she talking about the untold numbers Saddam killed in his political prisons, or is she merely aping the ridiculous number of supposed Iraqi dead due to the American invasion of 2003?  We already know the answer to that.  I’m being ironic introducing the alternative.

 How loving for her to wish the Bush family actually DIE the way she believes the masses of Iraqi people have.  I have a lot of people in my life I don’t especially like.  I’ve never wished death on them.  And she teaches.  She is a thinking mold for college kids.  We’re so utterly (udderly?) screwed that she stands in front of our kids.

 The Opinion Research Business (ORB) is often the “go-to” source for grossly inflated numbers by kooks too lazy to do actual research.  They use numbers based on interviews with people who “think” someone was killed, or someone who may have fled the country for any myriad of reasons, or simply moved.  This is where the 1.5 million number comes from. This is actually to the high end of their range of estimates, but what the hell?  If you’re going to accuse someone of war crimes, make the death toll impressively high,  right?

 However, these same humanitarians will never point out, or give an ounce of credence to, dissent.  John Rentoul, a columnist for The Independent newspaper, not exactly a conservative flaming torch, has asserted that the ORB estimate “exaggerates the death toll by a factor of as much as 10” and that “the ORB estimate has rarely been treated as credible by responsible media organizations, but it is still widely repeated by cranks and the ignorant.”

 I think I can narrow your choice of what I think of this refrigerator with a head, down to one.

 Other sensitive and compassionate tweets revolved around how Barbara Bush was an amazing racist, and how her only accomplishment was having been the parent to a war criminal.

A petition was begun seeking her firing.  She is a tenured professor. Firing her for her remarks made off campus, on a personal account, on her own time, however inane, insensitive, or repulsive they were, would simply result in a wrong termination suit—one she would win—and would result in a couple of things in the immediate.

 One, she’d have a large sum of money with which to continue grazing and with no work required to achieve it.  Two, it becomes a case on the wrong side of the freedom of speech argument.

The college began to drum up fervent support by stating that Randa the Hut was wrong in her assertion that she could not be fired.  The alumni association began making noise about curtailments coming from donors based on the acidity of her remarks.  Let this sink in.  People complain all the time about being offended by what someone said.  And make no mistake—almost everything this bitch says is something I disagree with.  If you want to call that offensive, I can’t stop you. But no where in the Constitution or Bill of Rights does it state that you have the right to never be offended;

People can’t simply be fired because they say stupid things—in theory.  That CEO who had to step down because of his vote comes immediately to mind.  Okay, so Liberals are not fired because of the stupid things they say.  Conservatives are not so protected.  Regardless, if she continues to say stupid things, we do have recourse.  Call her out on them.  Contradict her.  Prove her wrong.  Out-debate her.  If you have an opinion, say so.  I do, right here.  And she can’t stop me.  But stop whining about being offended.

Randa finally spoke up about what she said, and the remarks it brought on.  “I feel compelled to speak up because I want people to remember history.  I want people to known that our country’s actions don’t just disappear; they have real, negative consequences.  If we want a better future, we have to confront our past.”

 I guess her sense of history is limited to only what she considers bad, oppressive, or imperial.  She’s forgotten or glossed over the millions of people that have been liberated by our actions.  She dismisses the entire generations of formerly enslaved masses that are free to choose their societal futures based on our country’s interventions.  All she sees is a politic that enriches itself through blood for oil warfare at the expense of the unarmed.  Such is the affliction of the religion know as liberalism.

 You can’t fix stupid.  Most times, you can’t argue with it with any hope of swaying them.  When these liberal fixtures blurt out their ideological diarrhea, many times, you can only pray for enough ass-wipe to clean out your own personal space.  Peter Leyden and Ruy Texeira wrote an article along these lines.  (The Great Lessons of California in Armerica’s New Civil War.) We are fast approaching a point where each side will no longer abide the philosophy or the other.  One must win.

 Prepare yourself.  This is going to be ugly.