…so I’m watching Tucker Carlson on Fox.  I know, stunning.

He’s talking to Richard Goldstein, a Democratic Strategist who worked on both of the Clinton campaigns.  This, by itself, kind of dilutes the value and credibility of anything he says. I mean, he lost.  Twice

Tonight though, he is debating Roy Moore, the poor candidate that outlasted all other GOP candidates in Alabama.  Tucker is banging away on the Democratic approach to the campaign advertising in that is always denigrates to the lowest level, that of race.  Goodstein keeps repeating the Democrat talking points that are akin to Roy Moor wearing a pointy white cap.

 I caught this contradiction on the first go-round, and mind you, it was after two tumblers of scotch.  I can’t believe Tucker didn’t scorch this buffoon with it.

TC:  “…wouldn’t it just be easier to ask Roy Moore?”

RG:  “He’s lying about these women!  What do you mean, ask him?”

 So, basically, Roy is lying about one thing, so you can’t believe anything he says.

 Later on,

 TC: “…you don’t think that Roy Moore is for slavery…there’s no evidence that he is a racist..”

RG: “I’m looking at what Roy Moore says!”

 So, basically, Roy is telling the truth about one thing, and other truths can be extrapolated because of this.

 This is why most people hate politics.  Both sides do this, but predominantly, the Democrat side does.  You can discount everything a person says as dishonest until they say something you can twist to fit your prejudiced ideology.  Then you can believe everything they say that fits your narrative.  At that point, these other things are either lies or trivial.   You can have things both ways.  Or just one way.  Or one way, until it is convenient to be the other way.  People’s eyes glaze over until they toss a coin in the voter booth.  Those are better odds that fighting just on the merits of your beliefs.

 Unless they read this blog.